[lkml]   [2011]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [uclinux-dist-devel] [PATCH 0/6] clk: Initial feedback for off-SoC slow bus clocks
    On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 00:56, Barry Song wrote:
    > 2011/7/11 Mike Frysinger:
    >> On Sunday, July 10, 2011 23:57:40 Mark Brown wrote:
    >>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:53:44AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
    >>> Linus, CCing you in as apparently you're taking over the clock API work.
    >>> Do you need me to forward all the patches to you?
    >> along these lines, i dont think the new people on the cc noticed my earlier e-
    >> mail:
    >> for future series, could you cc ?  we
    >> dont do clock management on Blackfin parts atm, but it's something we would
    >> like to start doing.  our hardware can easily benefit from this.
    > Except that, AFAIK, arch/blackfin/mach-xxx is much similar with
    > arch/arm/mach-xxx with a lot of platform, i2c, spi board information.
    > it is probably we can also benefit from device tree as what ARM is
    > doing.

    i dont think device trees are a requirement for the clock api

    > but not sure whether it is really worthwhile for the current situation
    > and long term plan of blackfin. Anyway, there are not so many blackfin
    > SoC and boards as ARM.

    there are not plans for device tree support. no customers have asked
    for it, and we arent in the arm situation where we have a distro (like
    Ubuntu) riding us to have a single build boot on all the different
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-07-11 07:05    [W:0.020 / U:11.908 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site