[lkml]   [2011]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/8] x86-64: Allow alternative patching in the vDSO
    On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Rakib Mullick <> wrote:
    > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Andy Lutomirski <> wrote:

    >> +static void patch_vdso(void *vdso, size_t len)
    > I think, patch_vdso should mark with __init. Since it's been only
    > called from an __init function. We might hit a section mismatch, even
    > if we don't hit section mismatch, the will function get removed after
    > system boot - saves some .text size.

    Sure. It won't make any difference, because my compiler at least is
    smart enough to inline the whole function into init_vdso_vars, but
    it's the right thing to do anyway.

    >> +       return;  /* nothing to patch */
    > If there's nothing to patch, I think (perhaps) - it would be nice to
    > let user know through printk.

    Will do. I verified it myself by dumping the vdso image from memory
    and confirming that it got patched correctly, but if the code ever
    bitrots it'll be nice to have the warning.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-07-11 16:23    [W:0.026 / U:69.208 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site