[lkml]   [2011]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Should SUBLEVEL be removed for 3.x ?
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:07:13 +0200 (CEST) Jesper Juhl wrote:

> Hi
> If the plan is that the new kernel is going to be 3.0 (3.x) and the
> -stable kernels then get to tack on a third digit with EXTRAVERSION, then
> it seems to me that the main Makefile should get rid of SUBLEVEL - or?
> Or is the plan to ditch EXTRAVERSION for -stable kernels and have them use
> SUBLEVEL instead?
> There are a few scripts that need fixing if SUBLEVEL goes the way of the
> Dodo, but I didn't want to start fixing those without a clear indication
> of whether or not SUBLEVEL is going to/should die.
> So what's going to happen to SUBLEVEL/EXTRAVERSION?

I cannot answer this, but I'd certainly like to see a clear answer
since I also have several scripts that need such attention.


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-07-11 01:11    [W:0.061 / U:2.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site