lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jul]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] kprobes: Add separate preempt_disabling for kprobes
(2011/07/01 21:19), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 14:09 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
>> BTW, on my tip tree, add_preempt_count (a.k.a. inc_preempt_count())
>> is marked as __kprobes, so it can not be probed. Is there any change?
>>
>
> That is when debug or preempt tracer is enabled. Otherwise it's
> hardcoded into whatever calls it:
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER)
> extern void add_preempt_count(int val);
> extern void sub_preempt_count(int val);
> #else
> # define add_preempt_count(val) do { preempt_count() += (val); } while (0)
> # define sub_preempt_count(val) do { preempt_count() -= (val); } while (0)
> #endif
>
>
> Anyway, it still doesn't help the place that reads preempt_count() and
> then later uses the result. I hit the crash in schedule_bug() where it
> increments preempt count, then reads it to see if it is only 1.

Ah, I see, that what I need...
I've made a fix patch for that, so could you test that?

Thank you,

--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-07-01 15:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog