Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 1 Jul 2011 14:44:55 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/16 v2] [GIT PULL] tracing: various fixes |
| |
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 16:00 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > > > > > Ingo, > > > > > > I went through the patches and addressed your comments. I fixed the line > > > break issues (no need to have the original author resubmit for whitespace > > > clean ups), and I fixed the change logs that had the whacky tags caused > > > by my script. > > > > > > I replaced the one patch by Vaibhav that added the ioctl with the original > > > patch he sent that adds the free_buffer file to do the same thing. I also > > > added a patch to make it optional whether or not freeing the buffer disables > > > tracing. > > > > > > Please pull the latest tip/perf/core-2 tree, which can be found at: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace.git > > > tip/perf/core-2 > > > > > > Head SHA1: 1fd8df2c3970c9e7e4e262354154ee39e58bdd7c > > > > > > > > > Jiri Olsa (5): > > > tracing, function_graph: Remove dependency of abstime and duration fields on latency > > > tracing, function_graph: Merge overhead and duration display functions > > > tracing, function: Fix trace header to follow context-info option > > > tracing, function_graph: Remove lock-depth from latency trace > > > tracing, function_graph: Add context-info support for function_graph tracer > > > > > > Masami Hiramatsu (3): > > > x86: Swap save_stack_trace_regs parameters > > > stack_trace: Add weak save_stack_trace_regs() > > > tracing/kprobes: Fix kprobe-tracer to support stack trace > > > > > > Paul McQuade (2): > > > ftrace: Fixed an include coding style issue > > > async: Fixed an include coding style issue > > > > > > Peter Huewe (1): > > > tracing: Convert to kstrtoul_from_user > > > > > > Steven Rostedt (1): > > > tracing: Add disable_on_free option > > > > > > Vaibhav Nagarnaik (4): > > > tracing: Schedule a delayed work to call wakeup() > > > tracing: Use NUMA allocation for per-cpu ring buffer pages > > > tracing: Add a proc file to stop tracing and free buffer > > > ring-buffer: Set __GFP_NORETRY flag for ring buffer allocating process > > > > > > ---- > > > arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c | 2 +- > > > arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/error.c | 2 +- > > > include/linux/ftrace_event.h | 4 + > > > include/linux/ring_buffer.h | 2 +- > > > include/linux/stacktrace.h | 4 +- > > > kernel/async.c | 12 +- > > > kernel/stacktrace.c | 12 ++- > > > kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 20 +--- > > > kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 66 +++++---- > > > kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +- > > > kernel/trace/trace.c | 242 ++++++++++++++++++--------------- > > > kernel/trace/trace.h | 10 ++ > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 26 +--- > > > kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c | 223 +++++++++++++++---------------- > > > kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c | 4 +- > > > kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 6 +- > > > kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c | 4 +- > > > kernel/trace/trace_stack.c | 13 +-- > > > 18 files changed, 333 insertions(+), 321 deletions(-) > > > > Pulled, thanks a lot Steve! > > > > Hi Ingo, > > Was there an issue with this pull request? I don't see it in tip. I > was about to add a fix for Thomas and noticed that this pull wasn't > in.
Hm, the problem appears to be that your tip/perf/core-2 branch is on 0ef5bf1cd3bd - which does not match the bits you advertised in:
Head SHA1: 1fd8df2c3970c9e7e4e262354154ee39e58bdd7c
Thanks,
Ingo
| |