lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jul]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/16 v2] [GIT PULL] tracing: various fixes

* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 16:00 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Ingo,
> > >
> > > I went through the patches and addressed your comments. I fixed the line
> > > break issues (no need to have the original author resubmit for whitespace
> > > clean ups), and I fixed the change logs that had the whacky tags caused
> > > by my script.
> > >
> > > I replaced the one patch by Vaibhav that added the ioctl with the original
> > > patch he sent that adds the free_buffer file to do the same thing. I also
> > > added a patch to make it optional whether or not freeing the buffer disables
> > > tracing.
> > >
> > > Please pull the latest tip/perf/core-2 tree, which can be found at:
> > >
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace.git
> > > tip/perf/core-2
> > >
> > > Head SHA1: 1fd8df2c3970c9e7e4e262354154ee39e58bdd7c
> > >
> > >
> > > Jiri Olsa (5):
> > > tracing, function_graph: Remove dependency of abstime and duration fields on latency
> > > tracing, function_graph: Merge overhead and duration display functions
> > > tracing, function: Fix trace header to follow context-info option
> > > tracing, function_graph: Remove lock-depth from latency trace
> > > tracing, function_graph: Add context-info support for function_graph tracer
> > >
> > > Masami Hiramatsu (3):
> > > x86: Swap save_stack_trace_regs parameters
> > > stack_trace: Add weak save_stack_trace_regs()
> > > tracing/kprobes: Fix kprobe-tracer to support stack trace
> > >
> > > Paul McQuade (2):
> > > ftrace: Fixed an include coding style issue
> > > async: Fixed an include coding style issue
> > >
> > > Peter Huewe (1):
> > > tracing: Convert to kstrtoul_from_user
> > >
> > > Steven Rostedt (1):
> > > tracing: Add disable_on_free option
> > >
> > > Vaibhav Nagarnaik (4):
> > > tracing: Schedule a delayed work to call wakeup()
> > > tracing: Use NUMA allocation for per-cpu ring buffer pages
> > > tracing: Add a proc file to stop tracing and free buffer
> > > ring-buffer: Set __GFP_NORETRY flag for ring buffer allocating process
> > >
> > > ----
> > > arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c | 2 +-
> > > arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/error.c | 2 +-
> > > include/linux/ftrace_event.h | 4 +
> > > include/linux/ring_buffer.h | 2 +-
> > > include/linux/stacktrace.h | 4 +-
> > > kernel/async.c | 12 +-
> > > kernel/stacktrace.c | 12 ++-
> > > kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 20 +---
> > > kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 66 +++++----
> > > kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +-
> > > kernel/trace/trace.c | 242 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > > kernel/trace/trace.h | 10 ++
> > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 26 +---
> > > kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c | 223 +++++++++++++++----------------
> > > kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c | 4 +-
> > > kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 6 +-
> > > kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c | 4 +-
> > > kernel/trace/trace_stack.c | 13 +--
> > > 18 files changed, 333 insertions(+), 321 deletions(-)
> >
> > Pulled, thanks a lot Steve!
> >
>
> Hi Ingo,
>
> Was there an issue with this pull request? I don't see it in tip. I
> was about to add a fix for Thomas and noticed that this pull wasn't
> in.

Hm, the problem appears to be that your tip/perf/core-2 branch is on
0ef5bf1cd3bd - which does not match the bits you advertised in:

Head SHA1: 1fd8df2c3970c9e7e4e262354154ee39e58bdd7c

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-07-01 14:47    [W:0.056 / U:0.504 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site