[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 7/7] [v2] drivers/misc: introduce Freescale hypervisor management driver
    On Friday 03 June 2011, Timur Tabi wrote:
    > Arnd Bergmann wrote:
    > >> > I don't think it's correct to think of a hypervisor as firmware, so I don't
    > >> > think drivers/firmware is better.
    > >> >
    > >> > I'm not sure that creating virt/fsl and putting the driver in there is a good
    > >> > idea, because it will be the only driver in that directory. Unlike KVM, this
    > >> > driver is just a collection of front-ends to our hypervisor API. The actual
    > >> > hypervisor is completely separate. That's why I put it in drivers/misc, because
    > >> > it's just a single driver with a miscellaneous collection of interfaces.
    > > Ok, fair enough. If nobody has a strong preference any other way, just make it
    > > drivers/firmware then.
    > Did you mean to say drivers/misc?

    Sorry, I misread your first sentence above. I thought you said that you prefer
    drivers/firmware over virt/fsl. drivers/misc is definitely the wrong
    place for this, please choose a better one. Maybe drivers/virt/ ?


     \ /
      Last update: 2011-06-06 17:45    [W:0.018 / U:1.452 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site