Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:34:07 +0800 | Subject | Re: Build regressions/improvements in v3.0-rc5 (xfs on cris) | From | Américo Wang <> |
| |
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 02:21:06PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> Looks like arch/cris does not support atomic64_t. (?) >> >> Should we prevent xfs from being built on arch/cris? > > Or nuke cris until it's able to at least include an asm-generic header? >
Not that simple. Take a look at lib/atomic64_test.c, it said:
#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_MIPS) || defined(CONFIG_PPC) || \ defined(CONFIG_S390) || defined(_ASM_GENERIC_ATOMIC64_H) || defined(CONFIG_ARM) ... #else #warning Please implement atomic64_dec_if_positive for your architecture, and add it to the IF above #endif
So cris at least needs to implement atomic64_dec_if_positive()... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |