lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Subject[PATCH] timerfd: really wake up processes when timer is cancelled on clock change
From
Date
When the system time is set the clock_was_set() function calls
timerfd_clock_was_set() to cancel and wake up processes waiting on
potential cancelable timerfd timers. However the wake up currently has
no effect because in the case of timerfd_read it is dependent on
ctx->ticks not being 0. timerfd_poll also requires ctx->ticks being non
zero. As a consequence processes waiting on cancelable timers only get
woken up when the timers expire. This patch fixes this by incrementing
ctx->ticks before calling wake_up.

Signed-off-by: Max Asbock <masbock@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
--- linux-3.0-rc1/fs/timerfd.c
+++ linux-3.0-rc1.timerfd/fs/timerfd.c
@@ -61,7 +61,9 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart timerfd_tmrp

/*
* Called when the clock was set to cancel the timers in the cancel
- * list.
+ * list. This will wake up processes waiting on these timers. The
+ * wake-up requires ctx->ticks to be non zero, therefore we increment
+ * it before calling wake_up_locked().
*/
void timerfd_clock_was_set(void)
{
@@ -76,6 +78,7 @@ void timerfd_clock_was_set(void)
spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->wqh.lock, flags);
if (ctx->moffs.tv64 != moffs.tv64) {
ctx->moffs.tv64 = KTIME_MAX;
+ ctx->ticks++;
wake_up_locked(&ctx->wqh);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->wqh.lock, flags);

--
Max Asböck


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-06-03 22:53    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans