lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] plist: add mutex to the blessed lock type for plists
From
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 12:33 -0700, Dima Zavin wrote:
>
>> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>>  #include <linux/plist.h>
>>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>>
>> @@ -56,11 +57,14 @@ static void plist_check_list(struct list_head *top)
>>
>>  static void plist_check_head(struct plist_head *head)
>>  {
>> -     WARN_ON(head != &test_head && !head->rawlock && !head->spinlock);
>> +     WARN_ON(head != &test_head && !head->rawlock && !head->spinlock &&
>> +             !head->mutex);
>>       if (head->rawlock)
>>               WARN_ON_SMP(!raw_spin_is_locked(head->rawlock));
>>       if (head->spinlock)
>>               WARN_ON_SMP(!spin_is_locked(head->spinlock));
>> +     if (head->mutex)
>> +             WARN_ON_SMP(!mutex_is_locked(head->mutex));
>
> Spin locks are NOPs on SMP, but mutexes are not. Are you sure you want
> this as WARN_ON_SMP()?

Doh. Copy-pasty-itis.. Will switch to plain WARN_ON.

--Dima


>
> -- Steve
>
>>       if (!plist_head_empty(head))
>>               plist_check_list(&plist_first(head)->prio_list);
>>       plist_check_list(&head->node_list);
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-06-29 22:13    [W:0.082 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site