lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/29] gma500: Ensure the frame buffer has a linear virtual mapping
    On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:07:01PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
    > From: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
    >
    > We need this for the framebuffer in order to ensure that the kernel
    > framebuffer layer can handle it when using KMS. Except for the base
    > framebuffer this isn't a concern.
    >
    > Add an npage field to the gtt as too many copies of the page calculation
    > are getting spread around the code.
    >
    > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
    > ---
    >
    > drivers/staging/gma500/psb_fb.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
    > drivers/staging/gma500/psb_fb.h | 1 +
    > drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.c | 18 ++++++---------
    > drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.h | 5 ++--
    > 4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

    This doesn't apply:

    patching file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_fb.c
    patching file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_fb.h
    patching file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.c
    Hunk #1 FAILED at 79.
    Hunk #3 FAILED at 120.
    Hunk #5 FAILED at 149.
    Hunk #7 FAILED at 193.
    4 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.c.rej
    patching file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.h

    Any ideas?

    Is there drm changes in linux-next for this driver that I don't have?

    If so, maybe we need to just start sending these patches through that tree?

    greg k-h


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-06-28 23:29    [W:0.031 / U:3.184 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site