Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [Patch] dma: remove DMA_xxBIT_MASK macros | From | "Koul, Vinod" <> | Date | Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:17:50 +0530 |
| |
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 22:37 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 06/16/2011 11:00 AM, Américo Wang wrote: > > > > git grep shows there are no users in tree, so we can > > remove them safely. > > > > Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> > > Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> > > Oh, my __deprecated hack goes away. Nice :). > > Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
> > > --- > > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 7 ------- > > include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 21 --------------------- > > 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > > index 72e2384..8e2d816 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > > @@ -474,13 +474,6 @@ Who: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> > > > > ---------------------------- > > > > -What: DMA_xxBIT_MASK macros > > -When: Jun 2011 > > -Why: DMA_xxBIT_MASK macros were replaced with DMA_BIT_MASK() macros. > > -Who: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> > > - > > ----------------------------- > > - > > What: iwlwifi disable_hw_scan module parameters > > When: 2.6.40 > > Why: Hareware scan is the prefer method for iwlwifi devices for > > diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h > > index ba8319a..dc77808 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h > > +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h > > @@ -54,27 +54,6 @@ struct dma_map_ops { > > > > #define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) (((n) == 64) ? ~0ULL : ((1ULL<<(n))-1)) > > > > -typedef u64 DMA_nnBIT_MASK __deprecated; > > - > > -/* > > - * NOTE: do not use the below macros in new code and do not add new definitions > > - * here. > > - * > > - * Instead, just open-code DMA_BIT_MASK(n) within your driver > > - */ > > -#define DMA_64BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(64) > > -#define DMA_48BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(48) > > -#define DMA_47BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(47) > > -#define DMA_40BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(40) > > -#define DMA_39BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(39) > > -#define DMA_35BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(35) > > -#define DMA_32BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(32) > > -#define DMA_31BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(31) > > -#define DMA_30BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(30) > > -#define DMA_29BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(29) > > -#define DMA_28BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(28) > > -#define DMA_24BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(24) > > - > > #define DMA_MASK_NONE 0x0ULL > > > > static inline int valid_dma_direction(int dma_direction) > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > >
-- ~Vinod
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |