[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM)
    On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Andrew Morton
    <> wrote:>
    > I have a couple of thoughts here:
    > - If this patchset is merged and a major user such as google is
    >  unable to use it and has to continue to carry a separate patch then
    >  that's a regrettable situation for the upstream kernel.
    > - Google's is, afaik, the largest use case we know of: zillions of
    >  machines for a number of years.  And this real-world experience tells
    >  us that the badram patchset has shortcomings.  Shortcomings which we
    >  can expect other users to experience.
    > So.  What are your thoughts on these issues?

    Has Google submitted patches for their implementation?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-06-22 20:09    [W:0.019 / U:19.176 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site