lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM)
    From
    On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Andrew Morton
    <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:>
    > I have a couple of thoughts here:
    >
    > - If this patchset is merged and a major user such as google is
    >  unable to use it and has to continue to carry a separate patch then
    >  that's a regrettable situation for the upstream kernel.
    >
    > - Google's is, afaik, the largest use case we know of: zillions of
    >  machines for a number of years.  And this real-world experience tells
    >  us that the badram patchset has shortcomings.  Shortcomings which we
    >  can expect other users to experience.
    >
    > So.  What are your thoughts on these issues?

    Has Google submitted patches for their implementation?

    josh
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-06-22 20:09    [W:0.023 / U:29.276 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site