Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:02:31 +0200 (CEST) | From | Jiri Kosina <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH trivial] stop_machine.h: "disables preeempt" -> "disables preemption" |
| |
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote:
> Use the noun instead of a misspelled verb. > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> > --- > include/linux/stop_machine.h | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/stop_machine.h b/include/linux/stop_machine.h > index 092dc9b..2d3f0b1 100644 > --- a/include/linux/stop_machine.h > +++ b/include/linux/stop_machine.h > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static inline int try_stop_cpus(const struct cpumask *cpumask, > * stop_machine "Bogolock": stop the entire machine, disable > * interrupts. This is a very heavy lock, which is equivalent to > * grabbing every spinlock (and more). So the "read" side to such a > - * lock is anything which disables preeempt. > + * lock is anything which disables preemption.
If there wouldn't be the typo, I'd gladly keep the old version there. But with the typo being there anyway ... applied.
-- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |