lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH trivial] stop_machine.h: "disables preeempt" -> "disables preemption"
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote:

> Use the noun instead of a misspelled verb.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
> ---
> include/linux/stop_machine.h | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/stop_machine.h b/include/linux/stop_machine.h
> index 092dc9b..2d3f0b1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/stop_machine.h
> +++ b/include/linux/stop_machine.h
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static inline int try_stop_cpus(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
> * stop_machine "Bogolock": stop the entire machine, disable
> * interrupts. This is a very heavy lock, which is equivalent to
> * grabbing every spinlock (and more). So the "read" side to such a
> - * lock is anything which disables preeempt.
> + * lock is anything which disables preemption.

If there wouldn't be the typo, I'd gladly keep the old version there. But
with the typo being there anyway ... applied.

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-06-20 16:05    [W:0.058 / U:0.516 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site