[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v4 11/18] input: Add initial support for TWL6040 vibrator
    Hello Tejun,

    On Thursday 16 June 2011 16:06:00 Ujfalusi, Peter wrote:
    > > I suppose you meant alloc_workqueue()? :)
    > Oh, yes. I mean that.

    Just avoid another series...
    I have looked at the alloc_workqueue, and I'm not really sure what parameters
    should I use.
    #define create_singlethread_workqueue(name) \
    alloc_workqueue((name), WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1)

    I would use something like this instead of create_singlethread_workqueue:

    alloc_workqueue("twl6040-vibra", WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI, 1);

    Is this correct?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-06-17 10:39    [W:0.021 / U:5.512 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site