[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v4 11/18] input: Add initial support for TWL6040 vibrator
Hello Tejun,

On Thursday 16 June 2011 16:06:00 Ujfalusi, Peter wrote:
> > I suppose you meant alloc_workqueue()? :)
> Oh, yes. I mean that.

Just avoid another series...
I have looked at the alloc_workqueue, and I'm not really sure what parameters
should I use.
#define create_singlethread_workqueue(name) \
alloc_workqueue((name), WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1)

I would use something like this instead of create_singlethread_workqueue:

alloc_workqueue("twl6040-vibra", WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI, 1);

Is this correct?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-06-17 10:39    [W:0.052 / U:3.216 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site