On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > 
> > And regardless of the patch path that is taken, update test(s) if
> > applicable.

Thanks for the links, Randy, I hadn't thought of those at all.

> > I thought that someone from Red Hat had a kernel loadable
> > module for testing radix-tree -- or maybe that was for rbtree (?) --
> > but I can't find that just now.
> 
> http://people.redhat.com/jmoyer/radix-tree/

This one just tests that radix_tree_preload() goes deep enough:
not affected by the little change I've made.

> > And one Andrew Morton has a userspace radix tree test harness at
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/rtth.tar.gz

This should still be as relevant as it was before, but I notice its
radix_tree.c is almost identical to the source currently in the kernel
tree, so I ought at the least to keep it in synch.

Whether there's anything suitable for testing here in the changes that
I've made, I'll have to look into later.

Hugh