Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: Dynamic patching in discarded sections | Date | Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:25:03 +0200 |
| |
On Thursday 16 June 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > 10000 randconfig kernel build later without that patch, I'm rather sure > that there is only a single driver that is suffering from this. While your > patch absolutely makes sense, a less invasive workaround would be to just > not mark mmc_spi_remove as __devexit until Dave's patch gets in.
Scratch that. Even when Dave's patch gets into binutils, we'd still need to make a compile time decision to figure out if the linker is new enough, so we definitely need Nicolas' patch as well.
Arnd
| |