[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Cocci] Re: [PATCH v2] coccinelle: if (ret) return ret; return ret; semantic patch
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 05:35:47PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > except that 4 of the 5 ORs are cases where we want to do the -return ret; +
> > return ret; So I suppose for performance, I should actually add the +/- to
> > each of the 4 cases that we want cocci to generate a patch for?
> Actually, it's probably not that big a deal. It's only rewriting the ones
> where there is a return ret just before, not all the returns in the code,
> like I was originally thinking.

Ok :) I'll update the patch one last time - hopefully we've got everything nailed
down now :)

thanks for being so incredibly helpful!


> julia

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-06-15 18:07    [W:0.054 / U:6.564 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site