lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] unicore32: fix build error for find bitops
From
2011/6/13 Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>:
> On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 18:33 +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>> 2011/6/13 Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>:
>> > Thanks, please review following patch:
>>
>> Looks good to me.
> Could I add your acked-by information on this patch?

Of course, yes.

>> > diff --git a/arch/unicore32/kernel/ksyms.c
>> > b/arch/unicore32/kernel/ksyms.c
>> > index a897080..d98bd81 100644
>> > --- a/arch/unicore32/kernel/ksyms.c
>> > +++ b/arch/unicore32/kernel/ksyms.c
>> > @@ -24,8 +24,8 @@
>> >
>> >  #include "ksyms.h"
>> >
>> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(__uc32_find_next_zero_bit);
>> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(__uc32_find_next_bit);
>> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_next_zero_bit);
>> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_next_bit);
>>
>> I'm wondering why there are no EXPORT_SYMBOL for find_first_bit
>> and find_first_zero_bit.
> IMO, only functions that are needed by modules should be exported.
> When building modules under unicore32 & pkunity-soc, we only need
> find_next_bit and find_next_zero_bit exported at present, and if new
> functions are required, I am going to add them in the same time.
> In fact, I think, the 'arch-generic' ksyms.c is a better idea.

OK, I see.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-06-13 13:35    [W:0.058 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site