Messages in this thread - First message in thread
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
| | | Date | Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:38:40 +0200 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 08/10] NOTIFIER: Take over TIF_MCE_NOTIFY and implement task return notifier |
| |
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 05:36:42PM -0400, Luck, Tony wrote: > From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> > > Existing user return notifier mechanism is designed to catch a specific > cpu just as it returns to run any task in user mode. We also need a > machanism to catch a specific task.
Why do we need that? I mean, in the remaining patches we end up either running memory_failure() or sending signals to a task. Can't we do it all in the user return notifier and not have a different notifier for each policy?
Thanks.
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach GM: Alberto Bozzo Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
| |