[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 08/10] NOTIFIER: Take over TIF_MCE_NOTIFY and implement task return notifier
    On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 05:36:42PM -0400, Luck, Tony wrote:
    > From: Tony Luck <>
    > Existing user return notifier mechanism is designed to catch a specific
    > cpu just as it returns to run any task in user mode. We also need a
    > machanism to catch a specific task.

    Why do we need that? I mean, in the remaining patches we end up either
    running memory_failure() or sending signals to a task. Can't we do it
    all in the user return notifier and not have a different notifier for
    each policy?



    Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
    Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
    GM: Alberto Bozzo
    Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
    HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-06-13 00:41    [W:0.034 / U:2.452 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site