lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] coccicheck: add M= option to control which dir is processed
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Greg Dietsche wrote:

> On 06/08/2011 02:10 PM, Nicolas Palix wrote:
> > I am not familiar with out-of-tree development but I guess that in
> > that case we should
> > also add a "-I $KBUILD_EXTMOD/include" ?
> >
> >
> I decided to skip doing this in V2 of the patch. I did a very quick test and
> cocci didn't seem to like two -I flags on one command line.

What was the problem and what version of coccinelle do you have? To my
recollection, the ability to have multiple -I options was added sometime
not so long ago.

julia

> > The use of -I by Coccinelle depends on the other options (like
> > -include_headers or -all_includes).
> > Such options are retrieved from the comments in the cocci files.
> > So the need for -I depends on the semantic patch you consider. I think
> > it is thus better
> > to be "exhaustive" in that case.
> >
> > Julia, is there any performance problem in doing so ?
> >
>
> Greg
>
>
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-06-11 17:43    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans