lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] coccicheck: add M= option to control which dir is processed
    On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Greg Dietsche wrote:

    > On 06/08/2011 02:10 PM, Nicolas Palix wrote:
    > > I am not familiar with out-of-tree development but I guess that in
    > > that case we should
    > > also add a "-I $KBUILD_EXTMOD/include" ?
    > >
    > >
    > I decided to skip doing this in V2 of the patch. I did a very quick test and
    > cocci didn't seem to like two -I flags on one command line.

    What was the problem and what version of coccinelle do you have? To my
    recollection, the ability to have multiple -I options was added sometime
    not so long ago.

    julia

    > > The use of -I by Coccinelle depends on the other options (like
    > > -include_headers or -all_includes).
    > > Such options are retrieved from the comments in the cocci files.
    > > So the need for -I depends on the semantic patch you consider. I think
    > > it is thus better
    > > to be "exhaustive" in that case.
    > >
    > > Julia, is there any performance problem in doing so ?
    > >
    >
    > Greg
    >
    >
    >


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-06-11 17:43    [W:0.023 / U:0.212 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site