lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5] [resend] radio-sf16fmr2: convert to generic TEA575x interface
Date
On Wednesday 01 June 2011 17:45:31 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 26-05-2011 04:45, Takashi Iwai escreveu:
> > At Wed, 25 May 2011 21:21:30 -0300,
> >
> > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> Em 23-05-2011 09:17, Ondrej Zary escreveu:
> >>> Convert radio-sf16fmr2 to use generic TEA575x implementation. Most of
> >>> the driver code goes away as SF16-FMR2 is basically just a TEA5757
> >>> tuner connected to ISA bus.
> >>> The card can optionally be equipped with PT2254A volume control
> >>> (equivalent of TC9154AP) - the volume setting is completely reworked
> >>> (with balance control added) and tested.
> >>
> >> Ondrej,
> >>
> >> As your first series went via alsa tree, and we are close to the end of
> >> the merge window, and assuming that Takashi didn't apply those patches
> >> on his tree, as you're re-sending it, I think that the better is to wait
> >> for the end of the merge window, in order to allow us to sync our
> >> development tree with 2.6.40-rc1, and then review and apply it on the
> >> top of it.
> >
> > Yeah, I didn't pick it up as the patches are rather V4L-side changes
> > (although tea575x.c is in sound sub-directory).
> > And I agree with Mauro - let's merge it after rc1, so that we stand on
> > the same ground. This sort of cross-tree change is better done at the
> > fixed point than in flux like during merge window.
>
> Hmm.. I tried to apply it after -rc1. It didn't apply:
>
> Applying patch
> patches/lmml_808552_v5_resend_radio_sf16fmr2_convert_to_generic_tea575x_int
>erface.patch patching file sound/pci/Kconfig
> patching file drivers/media/radio/radio-sf16fmr2.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
> 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file
> drivers/media/radio/radio-sf16fmr2.c Patch
> patches/lmml_808552_v5_resend_radio_sf16fmr2_convert_to_generic_tea575x_int
>erface.patch does not apply (enforce with -f)
>
> Is there any missing patches, or is it just due to some other changes from
> the alsa tree?

It fails because of a stupid typo comment fix:
-/* !!! not tested, in my card this does't work !!! */
+/* !!! not tested, in my card this doesn't work !!! */

--
Ondrej Zary


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-06-01 21:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans