Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 9 May 2011 10:36:03 -0400 (EDT) | | From | Alan Stern <> | | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 3/5] PM: Support for system-wide power transitions in generic power domains |
| |
On Sun, 8 May 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> > > Make generic power domains support system-wide power transitions > (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze and > thaw callbacks to be associated with struct generic_power_domain > objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as appropriate.
...
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/domain.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/base/power/domain.c > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/domain.c > @@ -273,6 +273,280 @@ static int pm_genpd_runtime_resume(struc > > #endif /* CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME */ > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > + > +/** > + * pm_genpd_powered_down - Check if power has been removed from a power domain. > + * @genpd: Power domain to check. > + */ > +static bool pm_genpd_powered_down(struct generic_power_domain *genpd) > +{ > + bool ret; > + > + mutex_lock(&genpd->lock); > + ret = genpd->power_is_off; > + mutex_unlock(&genpd->lock); > + > + return ret; > +}
What is the purpose of the mutex? On the face of it, there's nothing to prevent another thread from changing the domain's power state in between the mutex_unlock() call and the return statement.
Alan Stern
|  |