Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 9 May 2011 13:11:49 +0200 | From | Jiri Olsa <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] kprobes,x86: disable irq durinr optimized callback |
| |
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:51:23AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2011/04/26 23:19), Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:46:25AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:01:31PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
SNIP
> >>> hi, > > > > makes the optimized kprobes to be missed. None is missed > > if the kprobe optimatization is disabled. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> > > Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> > > > Ingo, could you pull this as a bugfix?
hi, could this be pulled in?
thanks, jirka
> > Thank you! > > > > --- > > arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c | 5 +++-- > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c > > index c969fd9..f1a6244 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c > > @@ -1183,12 +1183,13 @@ static void __kprobes optimized_callback(struct optimized_kprobe *op, > > struct pt_regs *regs) > > { > > struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk(); > > + unsigned long flags; > > > > /* This is possible if op is under delayed unoptimizing */ > > if (kprobe_disabled(&op->kp)) > > return; > > > > - preempt_disable(); > > + local_irq_save(flags); > > if (kprobe_running()) { > > kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(&op->kp); > > } else { > > @@ -1207,7 +1208,7 @@ static void __kprobes optimized_callback(struct optimized_kprobe *op, > > opt_pre_handler(&op->kp, regs); > > __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, NULL); > > } > > - preempt_enable_no_resched(); > > + local_irq_restore(flags); > > } > > > > static int __kprobes copy_optimized_instructions(u8 *dest, u8 *src) > > > -- > Masami HIRAMATSU > Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center > Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory > E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
| |