lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: -longterm kernels
From
Date
On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 16:55 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 08:25:01AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > BTW, Greg, perhaps -logterm releasing policy should be revised somehow.
> > > Currently we have .32, .33, .34, .35 -longterm, what is kind a much.
> >
> > It's not "much" if you rely on that kernel version, right?
>
> Yes, but maybe would be better if they do not relay on some versions in
> long term manner, and i.e. .33 users would use .32 and .34 users would
> use .35 instead?

Ceasing to rely upon .33 isn't a trivial choice for -rt tree users.

-Mike



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-08 07:11    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans