lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: -longterm kernels
    From
    Date
    On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 16:55 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
    > On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 08:25:01AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
    > > > BTW, Greg, perhaps -logterm releasing policy should be revised somehow.
    > > > Currently we have .32, .33, .34, .35 -longterm, what is kind a much.
    > >
    > > It's not "much" if you rely on that kernel version, right?
    >
    > Yes, but maybe would be better if they do not relay on some versions in
    > long term manner, and i.e. .33 users would use .32 and .34 users would
    > use .35 instead?

    Ceasing to rely upon .33 isn't a trivial choice for -rt tree users.

    -Mike



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-05-08 07:11    [W:0.020 / U:119.496 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site