Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 7 May 2011 10:34:25 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] m68k: Merge mmu and non-mmu versions of sys_call_table | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> |
| |
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 22:39, Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> wrote: > Geert Uytterhoeven writes: > > On Thu, 5 May 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > Did you check the macros in unistd to see if they match the > > > actual table? I guess it would be a good time to comment out > > > the ones that are not implemented in either of the two ABIs. > > > > Like this? > > > > warning: #warning syscall pselect6 not implemented > > warning: #warning syscall ppoll not implemented > > warning: #warning syscall recvmmsg not implemented > > > > Do we need pselect6 and ppoll? I have vague memories not requiring it. > > They close user-space race conditions, so you want them.
So do you recommend to backport the wiring up of pselect6/ppoll to -stable? We always had their _NR_* defines, so I guess glibc was always compiled with pselect6/ppoll support, and will use it if it's present.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |