[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Fix powerTOP regression with 2.6.39-rc5
On 5/7/2011 10:20 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 16:44 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Steven Rostedt<> wrote:
>>> 2) we separate perf from ftrace and keep the "stable" ABI for perf, and let
>>> ftrace advance into a more efficient tracer.
>> The thing is, ftrace is still largely separated from perf, and this is why this
>> regression came in: a random tracing 'cleanup' churn was done to 'tracing'
>> which broke PowerTop.
>> Look at the commit itself:
>> e6e1e2593592: tracing: Remove lock_depth from event entry
>> Clearly you didnt even *realize* that there's a whole tooling world behind this
>> mechanism ...
> Note, I discussed this change with Frederic and he totally agreed with
> me on removing it. In fact, we are in discussions about getting rid of
> pid, preempt-count, and irq flags as well. But according to your logic,
> that is a no go. I guess Frederic also does not *realize* there's a
> whole tooling world behind this mechanism too.

btw if you remove some of these, how is userland supposed to find out if
an event happened in irq context?

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-07 20:03    [W:0.102 / U:7.832 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site