[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Fix powerTOP regression with 2.6.39-rc5
    On 5/7/2011 10:20 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
    > On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 16:44 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    >> * Steven Rostedt<> wrote:
    >>> 2) we separate perf from ftrace and keep the "stable" ABI for perf, and let
    >>> ftrace advance into a more efficient tracer.
    >> The thing is, ftrace is still largely separated from perf, and this is why this
    >> regression came in: a random tracing 'cleanup' churn was done to 'tracing'
    >> which broke PowerTop.
    >> Look at the commit itself:
    >> e6e1e2593592: tracing: Remove lock_depth from event entry
    >> Clearly you didnt even *realize* that there's a whole tooling world behind this
    >> mechanism ...
    > Note, I discussed this change with Frederic and he totally agreed with
    > me on removing it. In fact, we are in discussions about getting rid of
    > pid, preempt-count, and irq flags as well. But according to your logic,
    > that is a no go. I guess Frederic also does not *realize* there's a
    > whole tooling world behind this mechanism too.

    btw if you remove some of these, how is userland supposed to find out if
    an event happened in irq context?

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-05-07 20:03    [W:0.022 / U:6.648 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site