[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH][WAS:bcmai,axi] bcma: add Broadcom specific AMBA bus driver
    2011/5/7 Arend van Spriel <>:
    > On 05/07/2011 03:55 PM, Michael Büsch wrote:
    >>> Arnd: did you have a look at defines at all?
    >>> Most of the defines have values in range 0x800 → 0x837. Converting
    >>> this to array means loosing 0x800 u16 entries. We can not use 0x800
    >>> offset, because there are also some defined between 0x000 and 0x800:
    >>> #define BCMA_CORE_OOB_ROUTER           0x367   /* Out of band */
    >>> #define BCMA_CORE_INVALID              0x700
    > Please be aware that the core identifier itself is not unique (in the
    > current list they are). In the scan the BCMA_CORE_OOB_ROUTER will always
    > show BCMA_MANUF_ARM (did not look up the proper manufacturer define but you
    > get the idea, i hope).

    Unfortunately, I don't. Could you explain this? How core identified
    can be not unique? Can 0x800 mean ChipCommon but also SuperPCIeX?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-05-07 18:51    [W:0.020 / U:33.416 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site