[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH][WAS:bcmai,axi] bcma: add Broadcom specific AMBA bus driver
2011/5/7 Arend van Spriel <>:
> On 05/07/2011 03:55 PM, Michael Büsch wrote:
>>> Arnd: did you have a look at defines at all?
>>> Most of the defines have values in range 0x800 → 0x837. Converting
>>> this to array means loosing 0x800 u16 entries. We can not use 0x800
>>> offset, because there are also some defined between 0x000 and 0x800:
>>> #define BCMA_CORE_OOB_ROUTER           0x367   /* Out of band */
>>> #define BCMA_CORE_INVALID              0x700
> Please be aware that the core identifier itself is not unique (in the
> current list they are). In the scan the BCMA_CORE_OOB_ROUTER will always
> show BCMA_MANUF_ARM (did not look up the proper manufacturer define but you
> get the idea, i hope).

Unfortunately, I don't. Could you explain this? How core identified
can be not unique? Can 0x800 mean ChipCommon but also SuperPCIeX?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-07 18:51    [W:0.073 / U:3.532 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site