[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] m68k: Merge mmu and non-mmu versions of sys_call_table
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 22:37, Arnd Bergmann <> wrote:
> On Thursday 05 May 2011 20:44:20 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> recvmmsg is a false positive, as we set __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SOCKETCALL.
> This looks really strange. The commit that introduced recvmmsg (a2e27255)
> added it to both socketcall and as a separate syscall in a number of
> architectures, without a good reason for it. I guess it's too late
> to change that now, but we should at least fix the script so we
> don't report it missing when socketcall is set.

Some architectures don't use socketcall, so they use a separate syscall.
IIRC, powerpc is migrating away from socketcall (commit
86250b9d12caa1a3dee12a7cf638b7dd70eaadb6, "powerpc: Wire up direct
socket system calls"), hence they added a separate call for it.

> However, if your unistd.h has defined __NR_recvmmsg before, you should
> probably add it to the syscall table, just in case that someone built
> a binary with that number.

We never had it.

BTW, we have a hole at 218/219. I don't remember why, but it may have been
a placeholder for pselect6 and ppoll when that implementation was still in flux.
Couldn't find anything about it in git/cvs archives, so I'll check
have to check my
old mailing list archives...



Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-06 07:13    [W:0.081 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site