On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 5:11 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> Well, not really.  There are a few things to consider.
>
> First, in general, there may be devices that have a real parent and belong
> to a power domain at the same time, so we can't "steal" the parent
> pointers from them.

Ah. right we only have one parent per device. Ok, setting a power
domain as a device's parent is not going to work for some devices.


However, I have some other questions.

1. pm_genpd_runtime_suspend and pm_genpd_runtime_resume are opened to
outside (not static and "extern"ed). Are devices supposed to call
pm_genpd_runtime_* directly? Shouldn't they be hidden so that devices
are forced to turn on/off power domains with runtime_pm framework
only? Is there any reason to expose them?

2.  If we can assure that related clocks are not turned on when a
power domain is shutting down, it'd be nice.
I guess it would be sufficient to let it "WARN" at
gov->power_down_ok(). Is it the intention of governor?


Thank you! I also think this is going to help us a lot, too :)

- MyungJoo
-- 
MyungJoo Ham, Ph.D.
Mobile Software Platform Lab,
Digital Media and Communications (DMC) Business
Samsung Electronics
cell: 82-10-6714-2858
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/