lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: idle issues running sembench on 128 cpus
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 5 May 2011, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 01:29:49AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> > That makes sense, but merging the timeouts race free will be a real
> >> > PITA.
> >>
> >> For this case one could actually use a spinlock between the siblings.
> >> That shouldn't be a problem as long as it's not a global spinlock.
> >
> > Care to give it a try ?
>
> Ok, will try tomorrow.
>
> >> Here's a new patch without the raw. Boots on my Westmere.
> >
> >> + cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> >
> > Hmm. quilt refresh perhaps ? I know that feeling :)
>
> The scp to copy the patch was too slow. Noticed it later and sent a new
> one.

NP. Happens to hit everybody from time to time :)

Thanks,

tglx


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-05 01:55    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans