[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2 v2] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags
On 05/04/2011 03:31 PM, wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2011 13:58:39 EDT, Josef Bacik said:
>> +#define SEEK_HOLE 3 /* seek to the closest hole */
>> +#define SEEK_DATA 4 /* seek to the closest data */
> Comments here need nearest/next fixing as well - otherwise the ext[34] crew may
> actually implement the commented semantics. ;)

Balls, thanks I'll fix that.

> Other than that, patch 1/2 looks OK to me (not that there's much code to
> review), and 2/2 *seems* sane and implement the "next" semantics, though I only
> examined the while/if structure and am assuming the btrfs innards are done
> correctly. In particular, that 'while (1)' looks like it can be painful for a
> sufficiently large and fragmented file (think a gigabyte file in 4K chunks,
> producing a million extents), but I'll let a btrfs expert analyse that
> performance issue ;)

Heh well we do while (1) in btrfs _everywhere_, so this isn't anything
new, tho I should probably throw a cond_resched() in there. Thanks,


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-04 21:35    [W:0.123 / U:37.028 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site