[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ARM: Do not allow unaligned accesses when CONFIG_ALIGNMENT_TRAP
Hi Andi,

On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 22:10 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > It is possible that -fconserve-stack is still valuable on ARM given that
> > it is also used with -mno-unaligned-access for other things than
> > structure packing on the stack, and therefore its merits can be debated
> > independently from the alignment issue at hand.
> The big advantage of -fconserve-stack is that it throttles the inliner
> if the inlining
> would cause too much stack growth. This is something you likely want
> on ARM too, especially as code gets more and more complex.

Do you have any concrete examples of -fconserve-stack giving an overall
win that isn't in the noise? The fact that the GCC documentation
explicitly states that enabling the option can lead to `making the
program slower' does make me question why we're enabling it in the first

>From private conversation, the GCC guys don't seem to think this is a
bug so I'm reluctant to open a bugzilla ticket.


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-27 12:07    [W:0.063 / U:8.464 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site