[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] ARM Subarchitecture group maintainership
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 06:06:16PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 May 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > What do you want to do with with the various for-next branches?
> > > Do you want to queue things into your tree before hitting for-next?
> > The stuff which gets pulled in from the various suppliers is
> > aggregated in a separate for -next branch.
> I think the question is about the existing -next branches people already
> have - should they contain code that hasn't yet gone to you guys? We're
> doing that for audio at the minute (having subtrees in -next directly)
> and it's pretty helpful for miniising hassle for the maintainers of the
> core tree.

We obviously talk about arch/arm/[mach|plat]* stuff, drivers/ sound/
etc. should go through the relevant maintainer trees.



 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-26 10:37    [W:0.083 / U:3.284 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site