[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] ARM Subarchitecture group maintainership
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 06:06:16PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:

> > What do you want to do with with the various for-next branches?

> > Do you want to queue things into your tree before hitting for-next?

> The stuff which gets pulled in from the various suppliers is
> aggregated in a separate for -next branch.

I think the question is about the existing -next branches people already
have - should they contain code that hasn't yet gone to you guys? We're
doing that for audio at the minute (having subtrees in -next directly)
and it's pretty helpful for miniising hassle for the maintainers of the
core tree.

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-26 10:31    [W:0.060 / U:29.284 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site