[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: (Short?) merge window reminder
On 05/26/2011 01:21 AM, Tony Luck wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Boaz Harrosh <> wrote:
>> So if you combine all the above:
>> D. Y. N
>> D - Is the decade since birth (1991 not 1990)
>> Y - is the year in the decade so you have 3.1.x, 3.2.x, .. 3.10.x, 4.1.X and so on
>> Nice incremental number.
>> N - The Linus release of this Year. So this 3rd one goes up to 4 most probably.
>> Linus always likes, and feels very poetic about the Christmas version release.
>> He hates it when once it slipped into the next year. So now he gets to increment
>> the second digit as a bonus.
>> The 2nd digit gets to start on a *one*, never zero and goes up to *10*, to symbolize
>> the 1991 birth. And we never have .zero quality, right?
>> The first Digit gets incremented on decade from 1991 so on 2011 and not 2010
> This is clearly the best suggestion so far - small numbers, somewhat
> date related (but without stuffing a "2011." on the front). No ".0"
> releases, ever.
> But best of all it defines now when we will switch to 4.x.y and 5.x.y
> so we don't have to keep having this discussion whenever someone thinks
> that the numbers are getting "too big" (well perhaps when we get to the
> tenth decade or so :-)
> So the only thing left to argue is whether the upcoming release should
> be numbered "3.1.1" as the first release in the first year of the 3rd
> decade ... or whether we should count 2.6.37 .. 2.6.39 as the first
> three releases this year and thus we ought to start with "3.1.4" (so we
> start with "pi"!).

Yes, Yes I like this a lot. I love pi, thanks.

> Linus: If you go with this, you should let Boaz set the new "NAME"
> as a prize for such an inspired solution.
> -Tony

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-26 18:41    [W:0.081 / U:4.412 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site