[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] introduce intel_rapl driver
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:43:23AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> That's just wrong.. the reason you're wanting to have this timer is to
> avoid the RAPL MSRs from overflowing and you loosing offsets, right?
> But the above is actually forcing the event to create samples on a
> totally unrelated time base.
> RAPL should fail to create a sampling event since it doesn't have the
> capability to trigger overflow interrupts based on its events.
> If you want a timer, add one, but don't do this.
> If you expect you actually want to sample, use this event as part of a
> group and add a sampling event in there and use PERF_FORMAT_GROUP, Matt
> was working on patches to make perf-record capable of this.

Yep, I have some unfinished patches around here somewhere...


OK, they're in this repository on the perf/group-events branch,


Obviously since I last touched them in November of last year they're
more than likely not going to apply cleanly to tip, and perhaps more
importantly, I don't think I ever submitted them to LKML for review.

Rui, I'll try to look at your patch series over the weekend and get my
sampling patches into a state where they can be submitted for review
and used by the intel_rapl driver. Does that sound OK?

Or if you want to take a more proactive approach, you're welcome to
finish and submit them ;-)

Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-26 12:57    [W:0.116 / U:6.704 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site