[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC 0/9] mce recovery for Sandy Bridge server
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Linus Torvalds
<> wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Peter Zijlstra <> wrote:
>> Right, so you can't do things like that from NMI context, but what perf
>> can do is raise a self-IPI and continue from IRQ context (question for
>> the HW folks, can there be cycles between the NMI iret and IRQ assert
>> from whatever context was before the NMI hit?)
> Of course there can be - the code where the NMI hit may have
> interrupts disabled.

But the case when I'd want to do the "stop this task" thing is when I
think that I can recover - for memory errors detected while in kernel
code I expect this will only ever be a few special cases:
1) copy to/from user
2) copy page (for copy-on-write fault)
3) ...
and in these cases we don't have interrupts disabled. In fact I have
difficulty imagining a scenario where the kernel trips over a memory
error in interrupt disabled code that would ever be recoverable.

So my NMI handler can look at the saved pt_regs to see whether
it blasted its way into some interrupt disabled code and call that
fatal - if it came in while interrupts were enabled, then it could use
Peter's self-IPI thingy.


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-24 23:51    [W:0.132 / U:1.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site