lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC 0/9] mce recovery for Sandy Bridge server

    * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:

    > On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 14:30 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > Right, so you can't do things like that from NMI context, but what perf
    > > > can do is raise a self-IPI and continue from IRQ context (question for
    > > > the HW folks, can there be cycles between the NMI iret and IRQ assert
    > > > from whatever context was before the NMI hit?)
    > >
    > > Of course there can be - the code where the NMI hit may have
    > > interrupts disabled.
    >
    > D'0h yes of course!..
    >
    > Then I can't immediately see a way to stop a thread dead in its tracks.
    > Userspace yes, but not kernel-space.

    It's a best-effort thing: run proper kernel code (hardirq context) as soon as
    possible - but obviously not sooner than that! :-)

    Thanks,

    Ingo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-05-24 23:45    [W:0.022 / U:58.292 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site