[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: (Short?) merge window reminder
    On 05/23/2011 04:33 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar<> wrote:
    >> I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before
    >> cutting 3.0.0! :-)
    > So I'm toying with 3.0 (and in that case, it really would be "3.0",
    > not "3.0.0" - the stable team would get the third digit rather than
    > the fourth one.
    > But no, it wouldn't be for 42. Despite THHGTTG, I think "40" is a
    > fairly nice round number.
    > There's also the timing issue - since we no longer do version numbers
    > based on features, but based on time, just saying "we're about to
    > start the third decade" works as well as any other excuse.

    I don't think year-based versions (like 2011.0 for the first 2011
    release, or maybe 2011.5 for May 2011) are pretty, but I'll make an
    argument for them anyway: it makes it easier to figure out when hardware
    ought to be supported.

    So if I buy a 2014-model laptop and the coffee-making button doesn't
    work, and my favorite distro is running the 2013 kernel, then I know I
    shouldn't expect to it to work. (Graphics drivers are probably a more
    realistic example.)

    Also, when someone in my lab installs <insert ancient enterprise distro
    here> on a box that's running software I wrote that needs to support
    modern high-speed peripherals, then I can say "What? You seriously
    expect this stuff to work on Linux 2007? Let's install a slightly less
    stable distro from at least 2010." This sounds a lot less nerdy than
    "What? You seriously expect this stuff to work on Linux 2.6.27? Let's
    install a slightly less stable distro that uses at least 2.6.36."


     \ /
      Last update: 2011-05-24 23:27    [W:0.021 / U:12.808 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site