[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: (Short?) merge window reminder
    2011/5/24 Jan Engelhardt <>:
    > On Tuesday 2011-05-24 01:33, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    >>Another advantage of switching numbering models (ie 3.0 instead of
    >>2.8.x) would be that it would also make the "odd numbers are also
    >>numbers" transition much more natural.
    >>Because of our historical even/odd model, I wouldn't do a 2.7.x -
    >>there's just too much history of 2.1, 2.3, 2.5 being development
    > .oO(Though once 2.{7 or more, odd} trickle into the distros, it would
    > become pretty much apparent that they are not devel.)
    >>And then in another few years (probably before getting close to 3.40,
    >>so I'm not going to make a big deal of 3 = "third decade"), I'd just
    >>do 4.0 etc.
    > While 2.6 has certainly worn out, already thinking of a 4.0 is highly
    > reminiscient of the version number arms race Firefox and ChromeBrowser
    > are doing currently.
    >>Because all our releases are supposed to be stable releases these
    >>days, and if we get rid of one level of numbering, I feel perfectly
    >>fine with getting rid of the even/odd history too.
    > If I remember past-time discussions right, ELF was the contributing
    > factor to bump the major number to 2.0 back then; ever since 2.0, no
    > similarly breakthrough-ing event has occurred.

    What then about BKL removal? Nice place to celebrate with version jump
    and heaving some beers.


     \ /
      Last update: 2011-05-24 14:33    [W:0.029 / U:0.496 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site