lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH] posix clocks: correct error value in posix_clock_poll()
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@nikai.net>
---
It looks to me like -ENODEV might not be a good return value
in poll(). Would POLLERR be the correct one in this case?
kernel/time/posix-clock.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-clock.c b/kernel/time/posix-clock.c
index c340ca6..2424d3f 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-clock.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-clock.c
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static unsigned int posix_clock_poll(struct file *fp, poll_table *wait)
int result = 0;

if (!clk)
- return -ENODEV;
+ return POLLERR;

if (clk->ops.poll)
result = clk->ops.poll(clk, fp, wait);
--
1.7.5.rc3

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-24 12:57    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans