[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] drivers/amba: probe via device tree
    On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
    <> wrote:
    > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:42:34AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
    >> Russell, it seems to me that the primary behaviour that amba_bus has
    >> over platform_bus is the clock management, and secondarily
    >> verification of the type of device by the device id.  Am I correct, or
    >> am I missing something?
    > It matches by vendor/device ID just like PCI does, and does the bus
    > clock management and power management in a really nice way, which I
    > doubt platform devices will ever do.
    > The way this discussion is going, I'm going to suggest that we also
    > convert PCI stuff to being platform devices too.  I don't see the
    > point of PCI existing for all the same reasons being given in this
    > thread.

    I certainly don't see that as being the direction this discussion is going.

    I see a serious question about how best to model AMBA primecell
    devices in the device tree, and a similarly serious question about
    whether to instantiate them as platform_devices or amba_devices.
    Modelled behaviour in this case (clock/power management) is
    particularly important, and you're right, platform_devices will never
    implement that behaviour in the core code (this issue has already been
    pushed back on; see discussions about omap_device).

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-05-23 17:27    [W:0.020 / U:66.712 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site