lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 10/10] ptrace: implement group stop notification for ptracer
On 05/20, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> 1. A process has two threads t1 and t2. t1 is ptraced by p1. Both t1
> and t2 are running.
>
> 2. p1 INTERRUPTs t1. t1 enters TRAP_STOP and p1 notices it.
>
> 3. Something else sends SIGSTOP to t2 which initiates group stop.
>
> 4. As t1 re-traps to notify p1 of group stop, p1 issues PTRACE_CONT.
>
> 5. PTRACE_CONT succeeds right after t1 re-traps for notification and
> t1 resumes execution.

IOW. The root of the problem is that TASK_TRACED no longer means the
tracee is stopped, it can change its state and the "volatile" info
in si_pt_flags reflects this fact.

This makes me nervous ;) Yes, we hide the TRACED->RUNNING->TRACED
transitions, and I have to agree that the proposed API looks consistent
to me. Still, can't we do this differently ? (see another email).

Oleg.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-23 15:39    [W:0.104 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site