[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/10] ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE
    On 05/19, Tejun Heo wrote:
    > Hello,
    > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:55:39AM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
    > > I've been thinking about Jan's suggestion to make ATTACH and DETACH
    > > not require tracee to trap. We already have this for DETACH for cases
    > > where the tracer is killed and it seems it wouldn't be too difficult
    > > to make that happen for ATTACH either and for that to be truly useful
    > > I suppose PTRACE_SETOPTIONS shouldn't require trapped state either.
    > > Jan, would that be enough for the use cases you have on mind?
    > I've been trying this and clean DETACH requires the tracee to be
    > trapped (or not running). The arch detach hook, which BTW is not
    > executed when the tracer is killed, modifies tracee state expecting it
    > to be off-cpu.

    Argh. Yes, ptrace_disable() is the problem, I didn't think about it :/


     \ /
      Last update: 2011-05-23 15:13    [W:0.022 / U:18.556 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site