[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/10] ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE
On 05/19, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:55:39AM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > I've been thinking about Jan's suggestion to make ATTACH and DETACH
> > not require tracee to trap. We already have this for DETACH for cases
> > where the tracer is killed and it seems it wouldn't be too difficult
> > to make that happen for ATTACH either and for that to be truly useful
> > I suppose PTRACE_SETOPTIONS shouldn't require trapped state either.
> > Jan, would that be enough for the use cases you have on mind?
> I've been trying this and clean DETACH requires the tracee to be
> trapped (or not running). The arch detach hook, which BTW is not
> executed when the tracer is killed, modifies tracee state expecting it
> to be off-cpu.

Argh. Yes, ptrace_disable() is the problem, I didn't think about it :/


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-23 15:13    [W:0.138 / U:2.472 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site