Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 20 May 2011 17:20:18 +0600 | From | Andrey Rahmatullin <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.39-rc3, 2.6.39-rc4: XFS lockup - regression since 2.6.38 |
| |
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:19:29AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > x4 ~ # xfs_info / > > meta-data=/dev/root isize=256 agcount=4, agsize=1949824 blks > > = sectsz=512 attr=2 > > data = bsize=4096 blocks=7799296, imaxpct=25 > > = sunit=128 swidth=128 blks > > naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0 > > log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=3808, version=2 > > = sectsz=512 sunit=8 blks, lazy-count=1 > > realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0 > OK, so the common elements here appears to be root filesystems > with small log sizes, which means they are tail pushing all the > time metadata operations are in progress. Does that mean that such filesystems are not optimal in terms of performance and/or reliability and should have larger log sizes?
-- WBR, wRAR [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |