Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 3 May 2011 09:53:58 +0900 | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: cut down __GFP_NORETRY page allocation failures | From | Minchan Kim <> |
| |
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:14 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: >> On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:35:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: >> >> > Do you see my old patch? The patch want't incomplet but it's not bad for showing an idea. >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> typo : wasn't complete > > I think your idea is eligible. Wu's approach may increase throughput but
Yes. it doesn't change many subtle things and make much fair but the Wu's concern is order-0 pages with __GFP_NORETRY. By his experiment, my patch doesn't help much his concern. The problem I have is I don't have any infrastructure for reproducing his experiment. :(
> may decrease latency. So, do you have a plan to finish the work?
I want it but the day would be after finishing inorder-putback series. :) Maybe you have a environment(8core system). If you want it, go ahead. :)
Thanks, KOSAKI.
-- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |