Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 May 2011 12:18:54 -0400 | From | Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <> | Subject | Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86: don't unmask disabled irqs when migrating them |
| |
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 01:08:07PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2011, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > for [1/2] I think it's still necessary as it's meaningless to migrate a percpu type irq. > > However Stefano has sent out a cleanup patch for Xen percpu irqchip which uses > > nop mask/unmask hack borrowed from uv machine to work around the issue. As > > you suggested it's better to consolidate into the common place instead of scattering > > in different places. My view on this common logic is what [1/2] tries to address, is > > it correct? If yes, would you consider taking this patch? Stefano told me that his > > patches will go in in next merge window. So I think either you can take [1/2] now and > > then I'll do cleanup after Stefano's patch is in, or I can rebase my [1/2] after Stefano's > > patch to clean both xen and uv parts. > > Actually I think Kevin's generic patch is better too. > If you ack it I'll remove my patch right away from the queue (maybe I > should remove it anyway?).
I dropped your patch.
| |