Messages in this thread | | | From | Barry Song <> | Date | Thu, 19 May 2011 22:23:43 +0800 | Subject | Re: [RFC] ARM Subarchitecture group maintainership |
| |
2011/5/19 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>: > On Thursday 19 May 2011, Barry Song wrote: >> 2011/5/19 Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>: >> > On Thu, 19 May 2011, Barry Song wrote: >> > Something like that. The exact details will be fleshed out as we go. >> > The idea is to give a round of review from a higher point of view to >> > make sure no opportunities for code reuse is missed, etc. The mechanics >> > of how this code transitions from this tree into mainline during the >> > merge window is secondary. >> >> i asked this because we wanted to send the source codes of >> CSR(http://www.csr.com) to upstream as i have told you in LDS. it >> looks like we need to follow the below new changes to make our source >> codes acceptable? >> 1. arm device tree >> 2. new pinmux framework from Linus Walleij >> 3. move GPIO from plat/mach to drivers/gpio? > > I would count at least the last two as mandatory, for the device tree, > it depends on how much work it would be for you to do the conversion > and at what time you submit the series. The longer you wait before > submitting the series, the stricter the requirements will get. > > Do you have a diffstat or a git tree with your work available?
not yet by now. it should be coming in the middle of next month. we have workable codes but need a lot of refinations before sending patches for review. it is more like a new begin from scratch, so arm/arch changes should be things we can catch.
> > Arnd > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |