Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 May 2011 20:13:05 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/15] [GIT PULL] ftrace/recordmcount: cleanups and updates for recordmcount processing |
| |
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:08 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Ingo, > > > > Please pull the latest tip/perf/core-2 tree, which can be found at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace.git > > tip/perf/core-2 > > > > Note, this is not based off of my tip/perf/core branch, but is based off > of tip separately.
I pulled your tip/perf/core (b9df92d2a94e) on May 1, almost 3 weeks ago, into tip:perf/core.
> I'm not sure why you don't want to pull my tip/perf/core directly yet.
Because i already have? :-)
> [...] I'd like to get that infrastructure in and tested before the 40 merge > window so that we can focus on the perf function tracing in the 41 window, > and not try to figure out where bugs are between the two. > > That pull request is here: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130469692420787
Well, that is an RFC patchset, named:
[RFC][PATCH 00/13] ftrace: Allow multiple users to pick and choose functions
In that mail you specifically said:
" I'm posting this patch series as an RFC, but I do not expect it to change much. I still have to put it through more tests even though I ran several on each set already. "
... with no pull vector in it. If you want me to pull something you need to put it into a branch i can see and you need to send a pull request :-)
Thanks,
Ingo
| |