[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] comm: Introduce comm_lock spinlock to protect task->comm access
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> The changelog also fails to mention _WHY_ this is no longer true. Nor
> does it treat why making it true again isn't an option.

It's been true since:

Author: john stultz <>
Date: Mon Dec 14 18:00:05 2009 -0800

procfs: allow threads to rename siblings via /proc/pid/tasks/tid/comm

Although at the time it appears that nobody was concerned about races so
proper syncronization was never implemented. We always had the
prctl(PR_SET_NAME) so the majority of comm reads, those to current,
required no locking, but this commit changed that. The remainder of comm
dereferences always required task_lock() and the helper get_task_comm() to
read the string into a (usually stack-allocated) buffer.

> Who is changing another task's comm? That's just silly.

I agree, and I suggested taking write privileges away from /proc/pid/comm,
but others find that it is useful to be able to differentiate between
threads in the same thread group without using the prctl() for debugging?

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-18 00:59    [W:0.048 / U:3.844 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site